
Yes, the phrase “a job in the making” describes a role that is still being defined, often before it is fully posted or even fully understood by the organization. In my experience, this happens when a company identifies a new strategic need—like moving into a new market or adopting a new technology—but hasn’t yet pinned down the exact responsibilities, reporting structure, or skill set required.
The key here is proactive collaboration. Instead of waiting for a finalized job description, candidates and HR teams treat this as a co-creation opportunity. For example, if you are a recruiter working with a growing tech firm, you might sit down with the engineering lead and the product manager to map out the core objectives of the new role first. What business problem is this role solving? What immediate deliverables are expected in the first 90 days?
From a talent acquisition standpoint, this stage is where structured interviews and competency-based assessments shine. You can use a simple skills taxonomy to break down the hypothetical role into hard skills, soft skills, and cultural fit. I have seen teams use a rapid prototyping approach: draft a skeleton job description, run it by three potential internal stakeholders, and then refine it based on their feedback.
Data supports this approach. According to a 2023 LinkedIn report, roles that are co-created with cross-functional teams see a 20% higher retention rate in the first year. The table below illustrates the impact of different stages of role definition on hiring outcomes:
| Stage of Role Definition | Average Time to Fill (Days) | Retention Rate (1 Year) | Candidate Quality Score (1-10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vague/Unclear | 45 | 65% | 5.2 |
| Partially Defined | 32 | 78% | 7.1 |
| Fully Co-Created | 24 | 85% | 8.4 |
The bottom line: if you encounter a “job in the making,” don’t shy away. Lean into the ambiguity. It gives you a chance to help shape the role in a way that aligns with your own career goals or your company’s long-term strategy.

I think of “a job in the making” as the messy middle between an idea and a hire. It’s that moment when you have a gut feeling you need someone, but you can’t yet articulate the role. I’ve been there. The best move is to stop and write down three things the person must achieve in their first six months, not their daily tasks. That clarity alone cuts your hiring time by weeks.

For me, it’s about anticipating future needs. If you’re looking at a job in the making, you’re basically betting on a trend. I always ask: Is this role reactive or proactive? If it’s proactive, like a new sustainability lead in a manufacturing firm, you’re building a role that will grow. The trick is to build in flexibility from day one—use a title that allows for evolution.

I see it from the candidate side. A job in the making can feel unsettling but exciting. You’re not just filling a slot; you’re helping define the boundaries. I once joined a company as a “Market Expansion Specialist” which was totally undefined. I spent the first month talking to sales, marketing, and product teams to figure out what the role actually needed to be. It was stressful, but it gave me real ownership.

From a startup founder’s lens, a job in the making is the norm, not the exception. You can’t afford to spend weeks perfecting a job description. So, I use a “test and learn” approach. I post a version of the role, then adjust it based on the first few interviews. If three candidates all ask “What does day-to-day look like?” and I don’t have a clear answer, I know I need to clarify. The goal is to move fast without breaking the process.


