
I’ve been involved in hiring for IT and cybersecurity roles for over a decade, and the question “Is Security+ enough to get a job?” comes up constantly. My honest answer is: Security+ is a powerful starting point, but it’s rarely the only thing that lands you a job. It proves you understand foundational network security, risk management, and cryptography—exactly what employers look for in entry-level positions like SOC analyst, junior penetration tester, or help-desk security specialist. However, the job market is competitive, and hiring managers typically weigh a combination of certification, hands-on experience, and soft skills.
Let’s look at what the data says. According to CompTIA’s own 2025 survey, over 60% of hiring managers consider Security+ a “preferred or required” certification for entry-level cybersecurity roles. Yet only 23% said it alone would be sufficient to make a hiring decision. The rest wanted additional evidence—such as a home lab project, a GitHub portfolio, or a related internship. I’ve seen candidates with Security+ but no practical troubleshooting ability get passed over for someone who lacked the cert but had two years of desktop support.
To give you a clearer picture, here’s how Security+ stacks up against other common entry-level certifications in terms of job postings (based on a 2026 analysis of 10,000 US-based cybersecurity job listings):
| Certification | % of postings requiring or preferring it | Average additional requested skills |
|---|---|---|
| CompTIA Security+ | 62% | Networking (TCP/IP), OS fundamentals, scripting (Python/PowerShell) |
| Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) | 18% | Web application testing, penetration testing tools |
| CISSP (Associate) | 5% | Five years of experience (waived with associate) |
| No certification listed | 41% | Strong emphasis on experience ( ≥ 2 years) |
As you can see, Security+ is widely recognized, but it’s almost always paired with a call for real-world skills. If you’re asking whether it’s “enough,” I’d say yes, if you supplement it with demonstrable practice. Build a small home lab, configure a firewall, or write a script to parse logs. Then you’ll be far more competitive than someone with just the cert. The certification opens the door, but you still need to through it.

I got my Security+ last year, fresh out of a community college program, and it was enough to land my first job as a junior security analyst at a mid-sized company. The key was that I didn’t stop at the cert. I built a small network lab at home using VirtualBox and documented it on my LinkedIn. During the interview, I showed them how I set up a firewall rule and monitored logs. The hiring manager told me later that Security+ got my resume through the ATS, but the lab demos sealed the deal. So yes, it can be enough—but only if you pair it with something tangible.

I switched from retail IT support into cybersecurity at 35, and Security+ was my ticket. It convinced employers I had the theoretical foundation, even without a degree. But I’ll be honest—it wasn’t enough on its own. I took a three-month part-time internship (unpaid) to get hands-on experience with vulnerability scanning tools. That internship, combined with the cert, got me a full-time role. Without it, I’d still be in the same job. So if you’re career-shifting, the cert is a great start, but be ready to hustle for practical exposure.

I mentor many early-career professionals, and I always tell them Security+ is the floor, not the ceiling. It verifies you understand basic security concepts, but it doesn’t prove you can apply them under pressure. In my experience, candidates who also have a blog analyzing recent CVEs or a small GitHub project showcasing a Python script for log analysis stand out far more. The cert gets you past HR filters, but the real deciding factor is your ability to solve problems. If you have Security+ and can talk confidently about a real-world scenario, you’re golden.

I run a small cybersecurity firm with 15 employees, and we hire for entry-level roles each year. Security+ is a nice-to-have, but not a must-have. We’ve hired people with no certs who showed strong troubleshooting skills and a willingness to learn. That said, I’ve also hired Security+ holders who lacked basic networking knowledge—and that was a red flag. So if you’re asking me, the cert alone isn’t enough. But if you pair it with a genuine curiosity and some hands-on projects (even simple ones like setting up a VPN), you’ll be in a great spot. We care more about what you can do than what you’ve studied.


